Arman Grigoryan Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies School
The Arman Grigoryan School of Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies is now accepting applications for the 2025–2027 academic year.
This program is intended for individuals who are interested in and wish to acquire knowledge and skills in the fields of art criticism and curatorial practice.
All applicants must have a higher education degree, be able to read and understand English fluently, and preference will be given to those with prior studies in various fields of fine arts or those who hold a Bachelor’s degree in Art History, Cultural Studies, or the Humanities.
Spots are limited!
We wish you the best of luck with your application and would like to remind you that the deadline for submitting the application package is September 15, 2025.
Description of the Subject of Study
Although the art critic and the curator operate in the same professional sphere and both serve as intermediaries between the artist and the public—each engaged in presenting, interpreting, and explaining artworks—they still remain distinct figures within the field of contemporary art.
The art critic’s engagement with the artwork is indirect, involving only their gaze; their work is entirely literary in nature. Their primary tools are the pen, the word, and language. The curator, while not entirely divorced from writing and speech (especially when it comes to conceptualizing and articulating ideas), is involved in a much more gestural and plastic manner. Their involvement is physical and material—and equally managerial and economic—requiring planning, fundraising, execution, and more. Their activity also includes communication (press releases, correspondence, negotiations, etc.) and, not least, project-architectural work (as it involves spatial planning, organizing artworks, distributing them, and constructing the exhibition layout).
Despite these differences, the kinship between the work of the critic and the curator is undeniable—not only sociologically or functionally but also operationally: both engage in the act of selection and evaluation of the artist and the artwork, a process that, while varying in method, is always deeply personal.
General Program Content
The curriculum is built on the above-mentioned characteristics of the subject of study. It draws from various fields of art theory: Armenian and global art history, contemporary art theories, the history of architectural thought, methods for analyzing images and signs, as well as elements from cultural and humanities studies and philosophy.
Over the course of two years, students will attend a range of courses and seminars. Through theoretical and practical sessions, they will gain the knowledge and skills necessary to work in one or both of these fields. A key part of this learning outcome will be the final graduation project, which will be developed and implemented during the second year through group discussions and collaborative work.
Thus, the program includes both theoretical and practical components.
General Program Content
The curriculum is built on the above-mentioned characteristics of the subject of study. It draws from various fields of art theory: Armenian and global art history, contemporary art theories, the history of architectural thought, methods for analyzing images and signs, as well as elements from cultural and humanities studies and philosophy.
Over the course of two years, students will attend a range of courses and seminars. Through theoretical and practical sessions, they will gain the knowledge and skills necessary to work in one or both of these fields. A key part of this learning outcome will be the final graduation project, which will be developed and implemented during the second year through group discussions and collaborative work.
Thus, the program includes both theoretical and practical components.
First Year: Theoretical Courses
Art History Module:
The Myth of Modern Armenian Art History (Lecturer: Nazareth Karoyan)
History of Modern and Contemporary Art (Lecturer: Anna Galstyan)
Modern Armenian Art (Lecturer: Lilit Sargsyan)
History of Contemporary Armenian Art (Lecturer: Nazareth Karoyan)
Architecture and Urban Environments:
History of Architectural Thought (Lecturer: Ruben Arevshatyan)
Cultural Studies Module:
Visual Studies (Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan)
Culture and Technology (Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan)
Media Studies (Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan)
Philosophy Module:
Contemporary Philosophy (Lecturer: Naira Mkrtchyan)
Philosophy of Art (Lecturer: Davit Mosinyan)
Sociology of Art Module:
Socially Engaged Art (Lecturer: Hrachya Kazhoyan)
Second Year
The second year will be dedicated to acquiring practical skills and completing the final graduation project.
Admission Procedure and Conditions
Applicants can choose between two types of enrollment:
1. Student
Those wishing to enroll as full-time students should send a CV and a motivation letter to [email protected], with the subject line: “School of Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies”.
The annual tuition fee is 250,000 AMD.
Continuation into the second academic year is conditional upon the student’s performance and attendance during the first year.
Students working on their final project may receive financial support to implement it.
Courses will be held three times per week in the evenings, with two sessions per evening.
2. Auditor
Those who wish to attend individual courses without academic obligations may enroll as auditors. The fee depends on the duration of the course:
Short-term course (once a week for two months): 40,000 AMD
Mid-length course (once a week for 4.5 months): 60,000 AMD
Long-term course (once a week for nine months): 90,000 AMD
History of Armenian Contemporary Art: Spatialization of the Modernity
Lecturer: Nazaret Karoyan
The course examines the history of Armenian modern and contemporary art in the second half of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century, viewing it as a product of the spread and spatialization of modern art in the world on two dimensions: aesthetic and political. The six topics summarized in the course’s fifteen lectures will outline, on the one hand, local adaptations of the universal language of modernist art, and, on the other, initiatives aimed at overcoming the limitations of presenting these adaptations under totalitarian regimes. The course will pay special attention to the intersections of these two dimensions: Aesthetic Modernism as a contribution to political nationalism, and Political Nationalism as a force reshaping aesthetic modernism and pushing it towards contemporary art.
Political Theory / Philosophy
Lecturer: Naira Mkrtchyan
The course covers the theories and teachings of a number of key thinkers of the 20th and 21st centuries (such as I. Berlin, J. Rawls, H. Arendt, J. Butler, etc.). How to understand freedom? Why are human relationships characterized as fragile? Is human vulnerability unevenly distributed and why? What does this mean in terms of human life? How are justice and forgiveness possible? The above-mentioned teachings and theories, which revolve around these and other questions, as well as their solutions, often cross the boundaries of philosophy and are located in the field of interdisciplinary research.
Some of the included authors represent the wing of those who are critical, opposed to official institutions and dominant situations. Others, on the contrary, have carried out their activities within these institutions. This difference (sometimes even opposition) is expressed, and perhaps even conditioned, first of all in their way of thinking and philosophizing. Thus, it is possible to imagine the diversity of the intellectual spectrum of the period under consideration.
In addition to lectures, the course includes reading and discussion of short texts by some of these authors.
History of Post-War Avant-Garde and Contemporary Art
Lecturer: Anna GalstyanThe characteristics of contemporary art are the endless diversity of materials and styles, artistic pluralism. It considers art as an experience, it is an instrument of change. The viewer becomes part of the work of art, it is open and encourages dialogue and discussion, raises social consciousness, takes art outside of museums, is interdisciplinary and generally explores ideas, concepts, questions and practices.
The basis of all the above points is largely considered to be Marcel Duchamp, who stood on the threshold of modern culture with one foot and contemporary culture with the other, about whose contribution it would be impossible not to talk from the very beginning. Then we will move on to the main, key movements or artistic phases that have formed and continue to form contemporary art. The basis of the courses will be not only images, but also textual works of the same artists and critics who formed the context of the given cultural event.
Media Studies
Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan
Introduction: Media studies as a multi- or interdisciplinary domain of research; prerequisites, conditions of formation, commitments, distribution and applications.
Part one: analysis of media texts
In this part of the course, the basics of media semiotics will be discussed, as well as the main means of organizing media texts (genre, format) and their modern transformations. Then examples of detailed analysis of media texts (advertisement, photo, film) will be considered. Special attention will be paid and separate classes will be devoted to photography and cinematography.
Part two: Media-society relations.
A number of questions will be discussed in this part of the course. what perspectives are there to look at the interactions between media and culture (as well as cultural identity), what is the “politics of representation”; What is ideology and how to approach the question of the relationship between the media and the government? The next topics of the course include: the study of mass culture, advertising and consumerism, media and globalization issues.
Urban Environment and Historical-Cultural Communication
Lecturer: Ruben Arevshatyan
Analysis of the concept of “city”, stories related to the origin and formation of cities and urban cultures. Urban space and architecture as a means of understanding the multi-layered nature of socio-political, cultural paradigms.
Nvard Yerkanian
Elena Aydinyan
Hrach Bayadyan
Ruben Arevshatyan
Zhanna Andreasyan
Vardan Azatyan
Vahram Aghasyan
Vardan Jaloyan
Arman Grigoryan
Susanna Gyulamiryan
Angela Harutyunyan
Siranush Dvoyan
Anna Galstyan
Sona Harutyunyan
Nazareth Karoyan
Eva Khachatryan
Grigor Simonyan
Naira Mkrtchyan
Misak Khostikyan
Ashot Voskanyan
Lilit Sargsyan
Samvel Partamyan
2008
Exhibition work
and coverage
Nora Galfayan
Arusyak Gyulbudaghyan
Karin Grigoryan
Ophelia Zakaryan
Ani Petrosyan
Tatevik Lazaryan
Marianna Hovhannisyan
Nazeli Ohanyan
Arpine Saribekyan
2009 -2010
Cultural project
development and coverage
Harutyun Alpetyan
Armenak Grigoryan
Arevik Grigoryan
Karin Grigoryan
Nelly Yedigaryan
Gor Yengoyan
Nvard Yerkanyan
Taguhi Torosyan
Liana Khachatryan
Lusine Hamasyan
Lilit Ghalechyan
Sona Melik-Karamyan
Seda Shekoyan
Ovsanna Shekoyan
2010-2012
Cultural program design and implementation
Anush Arshakyan
Tigran Grigoryan
Mariam Loretsyan
Inna Kholodova
Vaginak Ghazaryan
Lusine Navasardyan
Eduard Paskevichyan
David Vardanyan
Susanna Vardanyan
Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies School
2012-2014
Vahe Budumyan
Sofa Danielyan
Anna Zhamakochyan
Ninel Melkonyan
Haykuhi Minasyan
Lena Nazaryan
Lilit Nikoghosyan
Arpi Ohanyan
Ani Papoyan
Lilit Petrosyan
Nare Sahakyan
Liza Sargsyan
Marianna Vardanyan-Mishoyan
2013-2015
Karine Aroyan
Ani Asatryan
Nune Aydinyan
Ruzanna Grigoryan
Tereza Davtyan
Lilit Antonyan-Konopleva
Elza Martirosyan
Sonya Msryan
Hayk Petrosyan
Sona Kalantaryan
2014-2016
Flora Armenakyan
Arpi Balyan
Anna Grigoryan
Seda Grigoryan
Christina Gevorgyan
Hasmik Tankyan
Anush Khachatryan
Gohar Khachatryan
Nane Khachatryan
Karina Hakobyan
Anna Hambardzumyan
Anahit Ghazaryan
Mikael Petrosyan
2018 – 2019
Tigran Aleksanyan
Susanna Amujanyan
Sona Arsenyan
Lilit Grigoryan
Maria Zakaryan
Ani Tunyants
Marine Khachatryan
Roland Khachatryan
2024 – 2026
Emma Muradyan
Nazeli Utujan
Mary Amirkhanyan
Antaram Azatyan
2025 – 2027
Ani Tonoyan
Gayane Ghazanchyan
Tatevik Mkrtumyan
Tigran Chadoyan
Antaram Azatyan
Emma Muradyan
Nazeli Utujyan
Mary Amirkhanyan
Karin Grigoryan
Nora Galfayan
Marianna Hovhannisyan
Nazeli Ohanyan
Nvard Yerkanian
Gor Yengoyan
Taguhi Torosyan
Harutyun Alpetyan
Armenak Grigoryan
Liana Khachatryan
Sona Melik-Karamyan
Arevik Grigoryan
Lousineh Navasartian
Sona Asatrian
Inna Kholodova
Nareh Sahakyan
Vahe Budumyan
Anna Zhamakochyan
Lena Nazaryan
Marianna Vardanyan-Mishoyan
Arpi Ohanyan
Teresa Davtyan
Lilit Antonyan
Marine Khachatryan
Lilit Grigoryan
Maria Zakaryan
Ani Tuniyants
2024-2026 Academic Year
Antaram Azatyan, Mary Moon, Emma Muradyan, Nazeli Utujyan
Concept Development Studio (Nazaret Karoyan), Project Production and Management Studio (Carine Aroyan and Lilit Grigoryan), Exhibition Architecture Studio (Ruben Arevshatyan).
About the Exhibition
By filming the scraping of paint residues, the artist shows how he cleans the palette of traces from the work he has just completed. However, the camera’s focus is not on the cleaned palette itself, but on the button-like masses that emerge through this act of “cleaning.” Each of these “miniatures” gives the impression of being an independent work of art, possessing its own nuances and structural expressiveness. Yet this impression is only apparent — an illusion. In reality, each miniature “remembers” the colors flowing through its veins and “involuntarily” reproduces the chromatic essence of the canvas created from the same paints.
2012-2014 Academic Year
Lena Nazaryan
Let’s Go to Work, If There’s a Place
The purpose of this research is to describe the problem of work that arose in rural communities of Armenia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The communities of Teghut and Shnogh in the Lori region of Armenia will be considered as a litmus test, in whose administrative territories preparatory work for the exploitation of a copper-molybdenum mine began by the decision of the RA Government in 2001, and public discussions were held in parallel to create jobs in the villages.
Nare Sahakyan
Episodes of Armenian Conceptual Art of the 1990s: Relationships and Positions
When writing the work, the author was guided by the question of what kind of special conversation is formed between artists who together try to implement a common idea: to appear in the same exhibition, to implement a joint artistic project. What positions do artists take in this conversation, depending on their artistic positions. What happens when some meaning is lost in that conversation, or another concern that extends beyond the conversation becomes the concern of the conversation? This conversation between artists is the basis of their relationship as artists, which in turn structures the situation in the field of art.
Vahe Budumyan
Strategies of Contemporary Art in Armenia in the 2000s: Documentation and Transformation
This work was realized as a result of reflections on a specific question: what role do artistic means play in the formation of works of art? By “means,” we mean the set of conventions derived from the physical medium of a work of art (canvas, tape, etc.), from which the artist’s strategy proceeds—the totality of forms of expression, methods, and tricks. It is not difficult to see that the question contains a premise, namely, that artistic means are not neutral, they are involved in the process of forming works of art, moreover, they are an inevitable and inalienable part of the works.