Arman Grigoryan Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies School

The Arman Grigoryan School of Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies is now accepting applications for the 2025–2027 academic year.

This program is intended for individuals who are interested in and wish to acquire knowledge and skills in the fields of art criticism and curatorial practice.

All applicants must have a higher education degree, be able to read and understand English fluently, and preference will be given to those with prior studies in various fields of fine arts or those who hold a Bachelor’s degree in Art History, Cultural Studies, or the Humanities.

Spots are limited!

We wish you the best of luck with your application and would like to remind you that the deadline for submitting the application package is September 15, 2025.

Description of the Subject of Study

Although the art critic and the curator operate in the same professional sphere and both serve as intermediaries between the artist and the public—each engaged in presenting, interpreting, and explaining artworks—they still remain distinct figures within the field of contemporary art.

The art critic’s engagement with the artwork is indirect, involving only their gaze; their work is entirely literary in nature. Their primary tools are the pen, the word, and language. The curator, while not entirely divorced from writing and speech (especially when it comes to conceptualizing and articulating ideas), is involved in a much more gestural and plastic manner. Their involvement is physical and material—and equally managerial and economic—requiring planning, fundraising, execution, and more. Their activity also includes communication (press releases, correspondence, negotiations, etc.) and, not least, project-architectural work (as it involves spatial planning, organizing artworks, distributing them, and constructing the exhibition layout).

Despite these differences, the kinship between the work of the critic and the curator is undeniable—not only sociologically or functionally but also operationally: both engage in the act of selection and evaluation of the artist and the artwork, a process that, while varying in method, is always deeply personal.

General Program Content

The curriculum is built on the above-mentioned characteristics of the subject of study. It draws from various fields of art theory: Armenian and global art history, contemporary art theories, the history of architectural thought, methods for analyzing images and signs, as well as elements from cultural and humanities studies and philosophy.

Over the course of two years, students will attend a range of courses and seminars. Through theoretical and practical sessions, they will gain the knowledge and skills necessary to work in one or both of these fields. A key part of this learning outcome will be the final graduation project, which will be developed and implemented during the second year through group discussions and collaborative work.

Thus, the program includes both theoretical and practical components.

General Program Content

The curriculum is built on the above-mentioned characteristics of the subject of study. It draws from various fields of art theory: Armenian and global art history, contemporary art theories, the history of architectural thought, methods for analyzing images and signs, as well as elements from cultural and humanities studies and philosophy.

Over the course of two years, students will attend a range of courses and seminars. Through theoretical and practical sessions, they will gain the knowledge and skills necessary to work in one or both of these fields. A key part of this learning outcome will be the final graduation project, which will be developed and implemented during the second year through group discussions and collaborative work.

Thus, the program includes both theoretical and practical components.

First Year: Theoretical Courses

Art History Module:

  • The Myth of Modern Armenian Art History (Lecturer: Nazareth Karoyan)

  • History of Modern and Contemporary Art (Lecturer: Anna Galstyan)

  • Modern Armenian Art (Lecturer: Lilit Sargsyan)

  • History of Contemporary Armenian Art (Lecturer: Nazareth Karoyan)

Architecture and Urban Environments:

  • History of Architectural Thought (Lecturer: Ruben Arevshatyan)

Cultural Studies Module:

  • Visual Studies (Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan)

  • Culture and Technology (Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan)

  • Media Studies (Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan)

Philosophy Module:

  • Contemporary Philosophy (Lecturer: Naira Mkrtchyan)

  • Philosophy of Art (Lecturer: Davit Mosinyan)

Sociology of Art Module:

  • Socially Engaged Art (Lecturer: Hrachya Kazhoyan)

Second Year

The second year will be dedicated to acquiring practical skills and completing the final graduation project.

Admission Procedure and Conditions

Applicants can choose between two types of enrollment:

1. Student

Those wishing to enroll as full-time students should send a CV and a motivation letter to [email protected], with the subject line: “School of Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies”.

  • The annual tuition fee is 250,000 AMD.

  • Continuation into the second academic year is conditional upon the student’s performance and attendance during the first year.

  • Students working on their final project may receive financial support to implement it.

Courses will be held three times per week in the evenings, with two sessions per evening.

2. Auditor

Those who wish to attend individual courses without academic obligations may enroll as auditors. The fee depends on the duration of the course:

  • Short-term course (once a week for two months): 40,000 AMD

  • Mid-length course (once a week for 4.5 months): 60,000 AMD

  • Long-term course (once a week for nine months): 90,000 AMD


History of Armenian Contemporary Art: Spatialization of the Modernity

Lecturer: Nazaret Karoyan

The course examines the history of Armenian modern and contemporary art in the second half of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century, viewing it as a product of the spread and spatialization of modern art in the world on two dimensions: aesthetic and political. The six topics summarized in the course’s fifteen lectures will outline, on the one hand, local adaptations of the universal language of modernist art, and, on the other, initiatives aimed at overcoming the limitations of presenting these adaptations under totalitarian regimes. The course will pay special attention to the intersections of these two dimensions: Aesthetic Modernism as a contribution to political nationalism, and Political Nationalism as a force reshaping aesthetic modernism and pushing it towards contemporary art.

Political Theory / Philosophy

Lecturer: Naira Mkrtchyan

The course covers the theories and teachings of a number of key thinkers of the 20th and 21st centuries (such as I. Berlin, J. Rawls, H. Arendt, J. Butler, etc.). How to understand freedom? Why are human relationships characterized as fragile? Is human vulnerability unevenly distributed and why? What does this mean in terms of human life? How are justice and forgiveness possible? The above-mentioned teachings and theories, which revolve around these and other questions, as well as their solutions, often cross the boundaries of philosophy and are located in the field of interdisciplinary research.

Some of the included authors represent the wing of those who are critical, opposed to official institutions and dominant situations. Others, on the contrary, have carried out their activities within these institutions. This difference (sometimes even opposition) is expressed, and perhaps even conditioned, first of all in their way of thinking and philosophizing. Thus, it is possible to imagine the diversity of the intellectual spectrum of the period under consideration.
In addition to lectures, the course includes reading and discussion of short texts by some of these authors. 

History of Post-War Avant-Garde and Contemporary Art

Lecturer: Anna Galstyan

The characteristics of contemporary art are the endless diversity of materials and styles, artistic pluralism. It considers art as an experience, it is an instrument of change. The viewer becomes part of the work of art, it is open and encourages dialogue and discussion, raises social consciousness, takes art outside of museums, is interdisciplinary and generally explores ideas, concepts, questions and practices.

The basis of all the above points is largely considered to be Marcel Duchamp, who stood on the threshold of modern culture with one foot and contemporary culture with the other, about whose contribution it would be impossible not to talk from the very beginning. Then we will move on to the main, key movements or artistic phases that have formed and continue to form contemporary art. The basis of the courses will be not only images, but also textual works of the same artists and critics who formed the context of the given cultural event.

Media Studies

Lecturer: Hrach Bayadyan

Introduction: Media studies as a multi- or interdisciplinary domain of research; prerequisites, conditions of formation, commitments, distribution and applications.

Part one: analysis of media texts
In this part of the course, the basics of media semiotics will be discussed, as well as the main means of organizing media texts (genre, format) and their modern transformations. Then examples of detailed analysis of media texts (advertisement, photo, film) will be considered. Special attention will be paid and separate classes will be devoted to photography and cinematography.

Part two: Media-society relations.
A number of questions will be discussed in this part of the course. what perspectives are there to look at the interactions between media and culture (as well as cultural identity), what is the “politics of representation”; What is ideology and how to approach the question of the relationship between the media and the government? The next topics of the course include: the study of mass culture, advertising and consumerism, media and globalization issues.

Urban Environment and Historical-Cultural Communication

Lecturer: Ruben Arevshatyan

Analysis of the concept of “city”, stories related to the origin and formation of cities and urban cultures. Urban space and architecture as a means of understanding the multi-layered nature of socio-political, cultural paradigms.

Nvard Yerkanian

Visual designer and graphic artist

Elena Aydinyan

Art critic, the editor of Critical Review, member of AICA-Armenia

Hrach Bayadyan

A cultural critic

Ruben Arevshatyan

Art critic, curator, artist

Zhanna Andreasyan

Sociologist, PhD

Vardan Azatyan

Art historian, theoretician and translator, Associate Professor of Art History and Theory at the Yerevan State Academy of Fine Arts

Vahram Aghasyan

Visual artist, theorist and curator. A member of “Komuna” social-cultural platform

Vardan Jaloyan

Culturologist, art critic and curator

Arman Grigoryan

Visual artist, art critic and a curator

Susanna Gyulamiryan

Art curator and critic, co-founder and president of “Art and Cultural Studies Laboratory” (ACSL) NGO. A member of AICA – Armenia

Angela Harutyunyan

Art historian and curator, Associate Professor of Art History at the American University of Beirut

Siranush Dvoyan

Literary studies scholar and lecturer of Comparative Literature at the American University of Armenia

Anna Galstyan

Art historian, senior lecturer at Yerevan State Academy of Fine Arts

Sona Harutyunyan

Curator, art historian, founding president of the

Nazareth Karoyan

Art critic, curator, translator, director of the Institute for Contemporary Art-Yerevan

Eva Khachatryan

Independent curator, Vice-President of AICA Armenia and member of CIMAM

Grigor Simonyan

International Humanitarian Project Manager in the field of public health in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe

Naira Mkrtchyan

Holds a PhD in Philosophy, currently an Associate Professor at Yerevan State University

Misak Khostikyan

Architect, historian and theoretician of architecture

Ashot Voskanyan

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor at the Yerevan State University and Adjunct Associate Professor at the American University of Armenia

Lilit Sargsyan

Art critic and curator, senior researcher at the Russian Museum of Armenia (collection of prof. A. Abrahamyan)

Samvel Partamyan

Painter, graphic designer, publisher

2008

Exhibition work
and coverage

Litit Bazhbeuk-Melikyan
Nora Galfayan
Arusyak Gyulbudaghyan
Karin Grigoryan
Ophelia Zakaryan
Ani Petrosyan
Tatevik Lazaryan
Marianna Hovhannisyan
Nazeli Ohanyan
Arpine Saribekyan

2009 -2010

Cultural project
development and coverage

Elena Aydinyan
Harutyun Alpetyan
Armenak Grigoryan
Arevik Grigoryan
Karin Grigoryan
Nelly Yedigaryan
Gor Yengoyan
Nvard Yerkanyan
Taguhi Torosyan
Liana Khachatryan
Lusine Hamasyan
Lilit Ghalechyan
Sona Melik-Karamyan
Seda Shekoyan
Ovsanna Shekoyan

2010-2012

Cultural program design and implementation

Sona Asatryan
Anush Arshakyan
Tigran Grigoryan
Mariam Loretsyan
Inna Kholodova
Vaginak Ghazaryan
Lusine Navasardyan
Eduard Paskevichyan
David Vardanyan
Susanna Vardanyan

Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies School

2012-2014

Armine Babayan
Vahe Budumyan
Sofa Danielyan
Anna Zhamakochyan
Ninel Melkonyan
Haykuhi Minasyan
Lena Nazaryan
Lilit Nikoghosyan
Arpi Ohanyan
Ani Papoyan
Lilit Petrosyan
Nare Sahakyan
Liza Sargsyan
Marianna Vardanyan-Mishoyan

2013-2015

Karine Aroyan
Ani Asatryan
Nune Aydinyan
Ruzanna Grigoryan
Tereza Davtyan
Lilit Antonyan-Konopleva
Elza Martirosyan
Sonya Msryan
Hayk Petrosyan
Sona Kalantaryan

2014-2016

Hripsime Asatryan
Flora Armenakyan
Arpi Balyan
Anna Grigoryan
Seda Grigoryan
Christina Gevorgyan
Hasmik Tankyan
Anush Khachatryan
Gohar Khachatryan
Nane Khachatryan
Karina Hakobyan
Anna Hambardzumyan
Anahit Ghazaryan
Mikael Petrosyan

2018 – 2019

Tigran Aleksanyan
Susanna Amujanyan
Sona Arsenyan
Lilit Grigoryan
Maria Zakaryan
Ani Tunyants
Marine Khachatryan
Roland Khachatryan

2024 – 2026

Emma Muradyan
Nazeli Utujan
Mary Amirkhanyan
Antaram Azatyan

2025 – 2027

Ani Tonoyan
Gayane Ghazanchyan
Tatevik Mkrtumyan
Tigran Chadoyan

Antaram Azatyan

Emma Muradyan

Nazeli Utujyan

Mary Amirkhanyan

Karin Grigoryan

Photography researcher, translator

Nora Galfayan

Cultural manager, co-founder of FOCUS art NGO.

Marianna Hovhannisyan

Curator and a researcher

Nazeli Ohanyan

Cultural journalist, broadcaster

Nvard Yerkanian

Visual designer and graphic artist

Gor Yengoyan

Visual artist and curator.

Taguhi Torosyan

An art worker

Harutyun Alpetyan

Art curator and engineering consultant

Armenak Grigoryan

Visual artist, curator and art critic

Liana Khachatryan

Fine Arts teacher

Sona Melik-Karamyan

Researcher- Content writer at Sigma Telecom Company

Arevik Grigoryan

Painter, designer, manuscript restorator

Lousineh Navasartian

Visual artist and a graphic designer

Sona Asatrian

Curator

Inna Kholodova

An engineer and a sketcher

Nareh Sahakyan

Researcher and curator

Vahe Budumyan

Visual artist

Anna Zhamakochyan

Sociologist, curator and art critic

Lena Nazaryan

Deputy of National Assembly of Armenia

Marianna Vardanyan-Mishoyan

Digital marketing and communications specialist

Arpi Ohanyan

Art historian graduated from Yerevan State University

Teresa Davtyan

Independent curator

Lilit Antonyan

Independent art curator

Marine Khachatryan

Art critic and a researcher

Lilit Grigoryan

Maria Zakaryan

Website Content Writer

Ani Tuniyants

Quality Assurance Engineer

2024-2026 Academic Year

The exhibition “Leo Leo Vardanyan: The Path of Matter” is the coursework of the students of the ICA’s ARMAN GRIGORYAN School of Art Criticism and Curatorial Studies, 2024-2026 academic year.

Curators:
Antaram Azatyan, Mary Moon, Emma Muradyan, Nazeli Utujyan

Concept Development Studio (Nazaret Karoyan), Project Production and Management Studio (Carine Aroyan and Lilit Grigoryan), Exhibition Architecture Studio (Ruben Arevshatyan).

About the Exhibition
With his new project The Path of the Matter, Leo Leo Vardanyan seeks to reveal the “backstage” or “behind-the-scenes” aspects of the creative process and to show the audience something that usually does not appear in exhibition halls.

What does a painting represent? Is it always only what we see on the canvas once the image is already “framed”? And how should we describe the state in which a work has not yet been “born” — when there is something in the artist’s mind that is still uncertain? What should be done with that uncertainty: with the remnants of paint left on the palette, when the artist considers the work complete and ready for exhibition?

By filming the scraping of paint residues, the artist shows how he cleans the palette of traces from the work he has just completed. However, the camera’s focus is not on the cleaned palette itself, but on the button-like masses that emerge through this act of “cleaning.” Each of these “miniatures” gives the impression of being an independent work of art, possessing its own nuances and structural expressiveness. Yet this impression is only apparent — an illusion. In reality, each miniature “remembers” the colors flowing through its veins and “involuntarily” reproduces the chromatic essence of the canvas created from the same paints.

2012-2014 Academic Year

Lena Nazaryan
Let’s Go to Work, If There’s a Place

The purpose of this research is to describe the problem of work that arose in rural communities of Armenia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The communities of Teghut and Shnogh in the Lori region of Armenia will be considered as a litmus test, in whose administrative territories preparatory work for the exploitation of a copper-molybdenum mine began by the decision of the RA Government in 2001, and public discussions were held in parallel to create jobs in the villages.

Nare Sahakyan
Episodes of Armenian Conceptual Art of the 1990s: Relationships and Positions

When writing the work, the author was guided by the question of what kind of special conversation is formed between artists who together try to implement a common idea: to appear in the same exhibition, to implement a joint artistic project. What positions do artists take in this conversation, depending on their artistic positions. What happens when some meaning is lost in that conversation, or another concern that extends beyond the conversation becomes the concern of the conversation? This conversation between artists is the basis of their relationship as artists, which in turn structures the situation in the field of art.

Vahe Budumyan
Strategies of Contemporary Art in Armenia in the 2000s: Documentation and Transformation

This work was realized as a result of reflections on a specific question: what role do artistic means play in the formation of works of art? By “means,” we mean the set of conventions derived from the physical medium of a work of art (canvas, tape, etc.), from which the artist’s strategy proceeds—the totality of forms of expression, methods, and tricks. It is not difficult to see that the question contains a premise, namely, that artistic means are not neutral, they are involved in the process of forming works of art, moreover, they are an inevitable and inalienable part of the works.